Affiliation:
1. Communication Department, Boston College, Boston, MA, USA
Abstract
This article explores the reasons why internet researchers should contemplate their responsibility for encountering distressing disclosure in the course of their online research. `Distressing' disclosure refers specifically to information that indicates an online communicant is considering harming him/herself or another/others (e.g. online users' announcements of suicide intentions, threats to kill another person, etc). Given both the nature of online communication and research, those who study internet users and communities may find themselves particularly likely to come across distressing information in their research. Using personal homepages as a case in point, this article inquires: are researchers legally accountable for reacting in some way to the distressing online self-disclosure of those they study? Absent a legal responsibility, do researchers have any ethical or moral obligation to intervene? If an ethical responsibility does suggest itself, what are the barriers to intervention? Finally, how might online researchers prepare themselves for their encounters with distressing self-disclosure?
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Communication
Reference26 articles.
1. Tarasoff and the researcher: Does the duty to protect apply in the research setting?
2. Interviewing Working-Class Gay Men Over the Internet
3. Basch, R. (1998) `Ring Around the Web' , Computer Life 4(1): 62-64 .
4. Cybersuicide: The Role of Interactive Suicide Notes on the Internet
5. Baume, P., A. Rolfe and M. Clinton (1998) `Suicide on the Internet: A Focus For Urging Intervention' , Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing 7(4): 131-141 .
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献