Affiliation:
1. Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy, University of Cambridge, UK
Abstract
The article analyses local contestation of data centres in the Dutch province of North Holland. I explore why and how local councillors and citizen groups mobilized against data centres and demanded democratization of decision-making processes about digital infrastructure. This analysis is used as a vantage point to problematize existing policy and academic narratives on digital sovereignty in Europe. I show, first, that most debates on digital sovereignty so far have overlooked the sub-national level, which is especially relevant for decision making on digital infrastructure. Second, I insist that what matters is not only where digital sovereignty lies, that is, who has the power to decide over digital infrastructural projects: for example, corporations, states, regions, or municipalities. What matters is also how power is exercised. Emphasizing the popular democratic dimension of sovereignty, I argue for a comprehensive democratization of digital sovereignty policies. Democratization in this context is conceived as a multimodal multi-level process, including parliaments, civil society and citizens at the national, regional and local levels alike. The shape of the cloud should be citizens’ to decide.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Communication
Reference88 articles.
1. Declaration of Independence for Cyberspace
2. BRICS Countries to Build Digital Sovereignty
3. Conflicts of sovereignty in contemporary Europe: a framework of analysis
4. Booy A (2021) Verbazing over bewering dat zout koelwater wordt geloosd; ’Wieringermeer wordt zo waardeloze woestenij die onleefbaar is voor mens en dier. Noordhollands Dagblad, 1 June. Available at: https://www.noordhollandsdagblad.nl/cnt/DMF20210531_84959988
5. Climate extraction and supply chains of data
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献