A different playbook for the same outcome? Examining Google’s and Meta’s strategic responses to Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code

Author:

Bossio Diana1ORCID,Carson Andrea2,Meese James3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Swinburne University of Technology, Australia

2. La Trobe University, Australia

3. RMIT University, Australia

Abstract

In March 2021, Australia enacted the News Media Bargaining Code (NMBC) legislation, which compels Google and Meta to pay for third-party news content on their platforms. To date, Australian newsrooms have made deals with both platforms totalling approximately AUD$200 million (US$126.4 million). The 1-year review of the Code has prompted questions about not just the legislation but also the lack of public detail about the deals made between news organisations and the platforms. This article seeks to critically analyse the strategic positions both Google and Facebook took in supporting public interest journalism before and after the introduction of the Code. Using a mixed methodological approach, we find that both platforms differed in their strategic engagement with Australian media organisations before and after the introduction of the NMBC and that the Code, as it stands, risks increasing platform influence in the Australian news market.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference45 articles.

1. ACCC (2019) Mandatory News Media Bargaining Code - Concepts paper (2019). Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Retrieved from https://www.accc.gov.au/by-industry/digital-platforms-and-services/news-media-bargaining-code/news-media-bargaining-code/concepts-paper

2. ACMA (2022) News Media Bargaining Code: overview of the code, including our role. ACMA, 18 May. Available at: https://www.acma.gov.au/news-media-bargaining-code (accessed 31 August 2023).

3. Australian Government (2021) Treasure Laws Amendment (News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code) Act 2021, Federal Register of Legislation. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00021/asmade/text

4. Digital Platforms and Journalism in Australia: Analysing the Role of Competition Law

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Platform frictions, platform power, and the politics of platformization;Information, Communication & Society;2024-06-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3