Trust in Classroom-as-Organization Simulations: Parallel Experiences of Participants and Facilitators

Author:

Levesque Laurie L.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Management & Entrepreneurship Department, Sawyer Business School, Suffolk University, MA, USA

Abstract

Background. As classroom-as-organization (CAO) simulations unfold within corporate or higher education classrooms, novice facilitators and their participants experience uncertainty in the absence of familiar and implicit sources of trust. Initial trust derived from the context, simulation, peers, and one’s self wanes as awareness dawns regarding the magnitude of difference between CAO and typical classrooms. New sources of trust arise from shared sensemaking about unfamiliar roles and interactions, growing confidence in redistributed responsibilities and authority, an environment characterized by psychological safety, feedback, and behavioral experimentation modeled upon the experiential learning cycle ( Kolb, 1976 ). Purpose. This article examines the parallel experiences of participants and novice facilitators as they initially lose trust in CAO simulations and those involved, and discover new sources of trust related to the simulation design. Using first- and second-hand experiences and extant literatures on trust and teaching and learning, the erosion of initial trust is explored, as well as how CAO simulation design principles foster new sources of emergent trust. Conclusion. Understanding the ebb and flow of participants’ trust in CAO simulations allows for targeted facilitation and coaching. Novice facilitators who examine how their own trust experiences parallel those of participants gain insight into interventions and empathy into the participant experience within this fully-experiential learning environment. Empirical research is needed to examine the mechanisms of trust loss and rebuilding in CAO simulations in relation to the enactment of unfamiliar roles, routines, and responsibilities.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3