Eye tracking during a simulated start of shift safety check: An observational analysis of gaze behavior of critical care nurses

Author:

van der Geest Yael1,Chau Ivan2,Wendel-Garcia Pedro David3,Buehler Philipp K4,Hautz Wolf5,Filipovic Miodrag2,Hofmaenner Daniel A3ORCID,Pietsch Urs25

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

2. Division of Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

3. Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

4. Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland

5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

Background: The handover and associated shift start checks by nurses of critical care patients are complex and prone to errors. However, which aspects lead to errors remains unknown. Fewer errors might occur in a structured approach. We hypothesized that specific gaze behavior during handover and shift start safety check correlates with error recognition. Methods: In our observational eye tracking study, we analyzed gaze behavior of critical care nurses during handover and shift start safety check in a simulation room with built-in errors. Four areas of interest (AOI) were pre-defined (patient, respirator, prescriptions, monitor). The primary outcome were different gaze metrics (time to first fixation, revisits, first visual intake duration, average visual intake duration, dwell time) on AOIs. Parameters were analyzed by taking all errors in account, and by dividing them into minor and critical. Results: Forty-three participants were included. All participants committed at least a minor error ( n = 43, 100%), at least one critical error occurred in 29 participants (67%). Taking all errors into account, longer time to first fixation and more revisits were associated with an increased risk of missing errors (Time to First Fixation: OR 1.099 (95% CI 1.023–1.191, p = 0.0002), Revisits: OR 1.080 (95% CI 1.025–1.143, p = 0.0055)). Conclusion: Error detection during shift start safety check was associated with distinct gaze behavior. Nurses who recognized more errors had a shorter time to first fixation and less revisits. These gaze characteristics might correspond to a more structured approach. Further research is necessary, for example by implementing a checklist, to reduce errors in the future and improve patient safety.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3