A feasibility randomised controlled trial of targeted oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

Author:

Martin Daniel S123ORCID,McNeil Margaret1,Brew-Graves Chris4,Filipe Helder1,O’Driscoll Ronan56,Stevens Jia Liu13ORCID,Burnish Rachel7,Cumpstey Andrew F7,Williams Norman R3ORCID,Mythen Michael G8,Grocott Michael PW7

Affiliation:

1. Intensive Care Unit, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK

2. Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK

3. Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK

4. Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK

5. Respiratory Medicine, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK

6. Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

7. Acute Perioperative and Critical Care Research Theme, Southampton NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

8. University College London Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK

Abstract

Background Despite oxygen being the commonest drug administered to critically ill patients we do not know which oxygen saturation (SpO2) target results in optimal survival outcomes in those receiving mechanical ventilation. We therefore conducted a feasibility randomised controlled trial in the United Kingdom (UK) to assess whether it would be possible to host a larger national multi-centre trial to evaluate oxygenation targets in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods We set out to recruit 60 participants across two sites into a trial in which they were randomised to receive conservative oxygenation (SpO2 88–92%) or usual care (control – SpO2 ≥96%). The primary outcome was feasibility; factors related to safety and clinical outcomes were also assessed. Results A total of 34 patients were recruited into the study until it was stopped due to time constraints. A number of key barriers to success were identified during the course of the study. The conservative oxygenation intervention was feasible and appeared to be safe in this small patient cohort and it achieved wide separation of the median time-weighted average (IQR) SpO2 at 91% (90–92%) in conservative oxygenation group versus 97% (96–97%) in control group. Conclusion Whilst conservative oxygenation was a feasible and safe intervention which achieved clear group separation in oxygenation levels, the model used in this trial will require alterations to improve future participant recruitment rates in the UK.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Critical Care Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3