The role of a critical care outreach service in the management of patients with haematological malignancy

Author:

Taheri Leila1,Anandanadesan Rathai2,de Lavallade Hugues3,Pagkalidou Eirini4,Pagliuca Antonio3,Mufti Ghulam3,Auzinger Georg5,Metaxa Victoria5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. South Thames Training Scheme, London Deanery, London, UK

2. South Thames/South East School of Anaesthesia (SESA), London LETB, London Deanery, London, UK

3. Department of Haematological Medicine, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

4. School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

5. Department of Critical Care, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Introduction Although improvement in survival from haematological malignancies has been reported, a substantial number of these patients develop life threatening complications. Critical care outreach services (CCOS) aim to avert inappropriate ICU admissions, while ensuring timely patient review. Methods We retrospectively analysed patients with haematological malignancy reviewed by an outreach service between January 2014 and December 2015 at a single institution. The aim of our study was to describe the patient population assessed by a well-established outreach team, identify predictors of ICU admission, as well as ICU and hospital mortality. Results Sixty of 126 patients reviewed (47.6%) were admitted to ICU. ICU and hospital mortality were 25.3% and 45.2%, respectively. The odds of being admitted to ICU was 13 times higher ( p = 0.013) if the patient was referred for hypoxia, 20 times higher ( p = 0.006) if they were referred for sepsis or 14 times higher ( p = 0.027) if they were referred to CCOS for hypotension, compared to when the team was automatically alerted. The odds of not surviving hospital admission increased 1.27 times for every extra day of CCOS review ( p = 0.02). When a patient was referred having a refractory or progressive haematological condition, the odds of not surviving to hospital discharge increased by four or 12 times, respectively, compared to when the referred patient was in remission. Receiving high flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNCO) was associated with a reduction in ICU admission ( p = 0.03), irrespective of the underlying diagnosis, performance status or location of delivery. The CCOS participated in end-of-life discussions in 29% patients. Conclusions ICU and hospital mortality of patients with haemato-oncological malignancy continue to improve. CCOS are heavily involved in the recognition and management of these patients, as well as in the facilitation of end-of-life discussions. Sepsis was associated with increased risk of ICU admission and mortality. Initiation of HFNCO outside ICU appears to be feasible and safe and was not associated with increasing risk in this single centre study.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Critical Care

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3