Affiliation:
1. National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS, France), EconomiX–University Paris West; Department of Economics, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London (United Kingdom).
Abstract
The article analyses two key questions: the European Union (EU) as a model of regional integration for developing countries (including sub-Saharan Africa) and the EU as a trade partner. It argues that these two dimensions have been questioned since the mid-2000s and that this questioning stems from common interrogations on the credibility and the efficiency of the EU’s policy choices. The first step of the argument is that while the EU has represented a paradigmatic model of ‘developmental’ regional integration arrangements, the EU’s adherence to specific theoretical assumptions has eroded the credibility of its model (competition, fiscal discipline) as an optimal tool of growth and welfare. The second step of the argument is that these assumptions have influenced the theoretical framework and trade policies devised for developing countries, notably the Economic Partnership Agreements, which appear to be inefficient as tools for these countries’ growth. This theoretical framework has not only weakened the credibility of the EU as a model of a developmental regional integration, but also weakened the economic efficiency of its trade policies and, in turn, the credibility for sub-Saharan African countries of the assertion by the EU that its trade policies could be a tool of development.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,History,Development
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献