A Methodological Critique of Fifty-Eight Selected Work Experiments

Author:

Cummings Thomas G.1,Molloy Edmond S.2,Glen Roy3

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90007

2. Irish Management Institute

3. Case Western Reserve University

Abstract

This paper evaluates the internal and external validity of 58 work experiments-e.g., job enrichment, participative management, and autonomous group studies. The experiments are classified according to their independent and dependent variables; then each study's research design is evaluated in terms of various threats to internal and external validity. The results show that the attitudinal and performance improvements reported in the experiments are questionable but not altogether implausible. The findings of the studies appear to be generalizable to a wide range of populations and settings. Several suggestions for the improvement of research in this field are presented in light of the results of this critique.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Social Sciences,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cited by 47 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Critical essay: sociotechnical construction;Construction Management and Economics;2023-10-12

2. Tenkasi, Ramkrishnan (Ram) V.: Expanding and Bridging the Boundaries of Theory, Practice, and Method;The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers;2021

3. Cummings, Tom: A Passion for People and Learning;The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers;2021

4. The Relevance Challenge in Management and Organization Studies: Bringing Organization Development Back In;The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science;2020-10-01

5. Tenkasi, Ramkrishnan (Ram) V.: Expanding and Bridging the Boundaries of Theory, Practice, and Method;The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers;2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3