Comparison of soft vs. rigid back support exoskeletons through psychophysical and biomechanical approaches during load handling

Abstract

As occupational exoskeletons are approaching real world implementation, perceptions about use and their effectiveness may differ across diverse age/gender groups, and device design. A soft and rigid type back-support exoskeleton (EXO) were evaluated in terms of selfrated maximum acceptable load (MAL), usability/social perceptions, and biomechanical outcomes during simulated manual material handling tasks. Thirty-six female and male participants from two age groups (18- 30 and 45-60 years) completed repetitive lifting and lowering tasks. Overall, both EXOs significantly improved participants’ MAL by ~6-7%, reduced peak trunk angle by 3-5 degrees, and reduced peak trunk extensor muscle activity by 9 - 13% . Participants generally reported both the EXOs as being useful, easy to use, and safe. This first systematic consideration of diverse age groups using a psychophysics approach in the context of passive occupational EXO use in laboratory settings contributes to bridging the gap between lab and field studies in exoskeleton implementations.