Affiliation:
1. University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
Abstract
The use of systematic training effectiveness evaluation (TEE) in flightcrew training provides training practitioners with methods to assess the validity and efficacy of specific curricula or training methods for set goals and objectives and deeper insight into the processes and systems used. As discussed in our extended abstract, there are various frameworks used to assess training effectiveness, but there have been few systematic comparisons of these TEE frameworks and little consensus as to which frameworks should be applied for the evaluation of modern training configurations. This poster will overview lessons learned from our comparison of various traditional, factors-based, and systematic frameworks and their respective qualities and limitations. We will provide a series of practical suggestions for the flightcrew training community and outline a baseline of the outcomes and factors to be considered when conducting a TEE in the flightcrew training domain, highlighting future directions for TEE research and practice.
Funder
Federal Aviation Administration
Subject
General Medicine,General Chemistry
Reference21 articles.
1. Air Carrier Training Aviation Rulemaking Committee. (2021). ACT ARC Recommendation 21-11: eLearning Guidance and Systematic Design Methodologies. Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/ACT_ARC_Rec_21-11.pdf
2. An Integrated Model of Training Evaluation and Effectiveness
3. A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence
4. Toward Theoretically Based Principles of Training Effectiveness: A Model and Initial Empirical Investigation
5. Handbook of Human Factors Testing and Evaluation
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献