Affiliation:
1. Federal Aviation Administration, USA
2. Cherokee Nation 3S, Yukon, OK, USA
Abstract
The remarkable level of safety of aviation operations is due, in part, to Federal Aviation Administration requirements and guidance that govern civilian aviation activities in the United States National Airspace System. At times, these requirements and guidelines need reevaluation and updating—for example, due to a known change in the pilot workforce or with flight deck technology. This paper provides examples of when this may be necessary, and explains the role that human factors research plays in this process. One objective of this paper is to make the case that it is necessary to periodically review and update requirements and guidance, even if the equipment or technology haven’t changed; often the human operators have changed or additional information is now available. Additionally, the process described here may be applicable to international aviation authorities, other federal agencies, and the private sector, as a best practice and critical safety initiative.
Subject
General Medicine,General Chemistry
Reference15 articles.
1. Beringer D.B. (2019). NextGen Final Report: Data for updating 14 CFR Part 25.143 and potential reference standards for Part 23, 27, and 29 aircraft: An evaluation of muscular force that can be applied to flight controls (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-19/5). Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
2. Pilot Source Study 2015: US Regional Airline Pilot Hiring Background Characteristic Changes Consequent to Public Law 111-216 and the FAA First Officer Qualifications Rule
3. The Effectiveness of Airline Pilot Training for Abnormal Events
4. Federal Aviation Administration. (1993). Human Factors Policy Order 9550.8. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/9550.8.pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献