Clinical Decision Support Systems and Trust in Automation: Case of a Clinical Reminder for Titration of Beta Blockers

Author:

MW Smith1ORCID,M Kalsy234,CR Weir5,CR Brown6,SS Virani78,JH Garvin59104

Affiliation:

1. Mile Two, Dayton, OH, USA

2. Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center

3. Case Western Reserve University, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Cleveland, OH, USA

4. Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS 2.0), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

5. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

6. ReadySet, Oakland CA, USA

7. Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan

8. Texas Heart institute, Houston, TX, USA

9. VA Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L. Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA

10. Division of Health Information Management and Systems, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

Abstract

Trust in automation depends on more than just the automation itself, but the larger context in which the automation and the human operator are collaborating. This study takes a naturalistic approach to explore providers' trust in a Clinical Decision Support System. Primary Care Providers were shown simulated medical records and a prototype Clinical Reminder indicating that the patient should be titrated with recommended Beta Blockers to address the patient's Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction. Analysis of responses showed three main themes: Concerns about the medical documentation used to generate the recommendation; Complexity of the patient condition and care delivery context (and how such factors limit possible courses of action); and Concerns about the Clinical Reminder and clinical guideline it is instantiating. These results align with the macrocognitive model of trust and reliance based on sensemaking and flexecution.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,General Chemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3