Affiliation:
1. Alberta Health Services
Abstract
Background: The workplace provides a unique opportunity to intervene on tobacco use, by implementing multilevel interventions engaging diverse employees. Using the social ecological model (SEM), this scoping review aimed to synthesize descriptions of multilevel workplace tobacco control programs to create a health equity informed framework for intervention planning. Methods: Multiple databases were searched for articles published from January 2010 to December 2020 meeting inclusion criteria (i.e., discussed multilevel tobacco cessation interventions that intervene, target, or incorporate two or more levels of influence, and one of the levels must be the workplace). Articles were screened by two independent researchers and included if they discussed multilevel tobacco cessation interventions that intervened, targeted, or incorporated two or more levels of influence. To integrate the extracted information into the SEM, we utilized the McLeroy et al. model and definitions to describe potential multilevel interventions and their determinants. Results: Nine articles were included in this review. No studies intervened across all five levels (individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy), and the most common levels of intervention were individual (e.g., individual counseling), interpersonal (e.g., group therapy), and institutional (e.g., interventions during work hours). Participation rates varied by key social determinants of health (SDOHs) such as age, gender, education and income. Barriers including cost and sustainability influenced successful implementation, while leadership endorsement and accessibility facilitated successful implementation. Discussion/Application to Practice: Multilevel interventions targeting at least two SEM levels may reduce persistent health inequities if they address how SDOHs influence individual health behaviors. Employee characteristics impacted the success of tobacco cessation interventions, but more research is needed to understand the barriers and facilitators related to workplace characteristics.
Subject
Nursing (miscellaneous),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference52 articles.
1. Asfar T., Arheart K. L., McClure L. A., Ruano-Herreria E. C., Dietz N. A., Ward K. D., Caban-Martinez A. J., Del Camp D. S. M., Lee D. J. (2020). Implementing a novel workplace smoking cessation intervention targeting Hispanic/Latino construction workers: A pilot cluster randomized trial. Health Education & Behavior, 48, 795–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/10.1177/1090198120960395
2. Baron S. L., Beard S., Davis L. K., Delp L., Forst L., Kidd-Taylor A., Liebman A. K., Linnan L., Punnett L., Welch L. S. (2014). Promoting integrated approaches to reducing health inequities among low-income workers: Applying a social ecological framework. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 57(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22174
3. Blas E., Sivasankara K. (2010). Equity, social determinants and public health programmes. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44289
4. Burgard S. A., Lin K. Y. (2013). Bad jobs, bad health? How work and working conditions contribute to health disparities. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(8), 1105–1127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213487347
5. Burton J., World Health Organization. (2010). WHO healthy workplace framework and model: Background and supporting literature and practices. https://www.who.int/occupational_health/healthy_workplace_framework.pdf