Testing an implementation package in a housing skills training pilot for homeless-experienced persons with serious mental illness

Author:

Gabrielian Sonya123ORCID,Hamilton Alison B.123ORCID,Gelberg Lillian124,Koosis Ella R.5,Hoffmann Lauren1,Carlson David M.23ORCID,Young Alexander S.123

Affiliation:

1. Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA

2. University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA

3. UCLA Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA

4. UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA

5. VA National Center for PTSD, Palo Alto, CA, USA

Abstract

Background Evidence-based practices (EBPs) improve housing and health for persons who have experienced homelessness with serious mental illness (PEH-SMI) but are challenging to implement. We tested a strategy to support pilot implementation of a 12-session housing skills training intervention for PEH-SMI, tailored from effective social skills training interventions. We aimed to optimize the implementation strategy and intervention prior to an implementation trial. Method We provided training and technical assistance to nine providers to support pilot implementation of this intervention to six groups of PEH-SMI ( n = 35) engaged in VA Greater Los Angeles’ homeless services. We used scales and semi-structured interviews with 14 PEH-SMI and all interventionists to inform implementation strategy adaptations, identify factors that impacted implementation, and assess perceptions of the intervention. Attendance was tracked and we observed a random sample of each interventionist's groups to assess treatment fidelity. Results Interventionists perceived the implementation strategy and the intervention favorably. However, interventionists often lacked physical space, staff, and resources (e.g., computers) to conduct the intervention. Interventionists found the content valuable for participants and a few suggested that group engagement should be a prerequisite for obtaining housing services. PEH-SMI were interested in the intervention's content and receptive to the group-based format. Participants attended a mean of 4 ± 3/12 groups; all groups observed had acceptable fidelity. Problems with intervention retention were described, suggesting challenges maintaining group participation when participants transitioned between VA homeless services. Conclusions To support the implementation of an EBP for PEH-SMI in homeless programs, these data suggest the value of training/technical assistance and strategies that enhance program-level buy-in to address resource concerns. Intervention adaptations, e.g., using a drop-in, open group format, in community-based settings that are easily accessible to PEH-SMI, may also increase adoption. This project was registered as “Improving Housing Outcomes for Homeless Veterans” Trial registration NCT03646149, registered 8/24/2018.

Funder

VA HSR&D

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference26 articles.

1. Attkisson C. (2020). Administering and scoring the CSQ scales. https://csqscales.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/CSQ-Administering-Scoring-2020-02-01.pdf

2. CFIR Research Team-Center for Clinical Management Research. (n.d.). Consolidated framework for implementation research. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://cfirguide.org/index.html

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3