Outcomes in Neonates Following the Surgical Removal of a Teratoma: A NSW and ACT Experience

Author:

Singh Moni Pankhuri1ORCID,Popat Himanshu12,Holland Andrew J. A.23ORCID,Walker Karen124

Affiliation:

1. Grace Centre for Newborn Intensive Care, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia

2. Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

3. Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia

4. The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Aim To describe the characteristics and outcomes of neonates admitted to tertiary hospitals in New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory who have undergone surgical removal of a teratoma, as there is paucity of Australian data. Methods All neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with teratoma between 2007 and 2017 inclusive (as per neonatal intensive care units data collection) were included in this retrospective study. Results Forty-three neonates with a diagnosis of teratoma were included in the study. The most common tumors were sacrococcygeal teratomas, accounting for 79% (34) of all the cases. Twenty-four (56%) neonates were diagnosed with teratoma antenatally. Ninety-one percent (39) of the deliveries took place in the tertiary center. Median gestational age of the neonates was 37 weeks and the median weight was 3.39 kg. One or more additional anomalies apart from teratoma were detected in 16 neonates (37%), most common being congenital hydrocephalus and hydronephrosis. Overall survival was 93% at hospital discharge: the 3 neonates who died soon after birth did not undergo surgery and they all were premature with poor Apgar scores. Conclusions Sacrococcygeal teratoma was the most common type of teratoma with more than half of the cases determined antenatally. Overall survival of neonates after surgery for teratoma is high.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3