Local anesthesia combined with intra-articular ropivacaine can provide satisfactory pain control in ankle arthroscopic surgery: A retrospective cohort study

Author:

An Mingyang1ORCID,Su Xiangzheng2,Wei Min1,Zhang Baiqing3,Gao Feng4ORCID,Hu Bo5,Dong Chenhui6,Liu Yujie1,Qi Wei1,Li Chunbao1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

2. Department of Emergency, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

3. Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The Beijing Armed Police General Corps Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

4. Department of Sports Injury and Arthroscopy Surgery, National Institute of Sports Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

5. The Second Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chaoyang Integrative Medicine Emergency Medical Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

6. Department of Sports Medicine, Orthopedic Surgery and Research Centre of PLA, Hospital 940 of PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China

Abstract

Background: Local anesthesia (LA) is widely used in knee arthroscopic surgery but not in ankle arthroscopy. Objective: To understand the effectiveness and safety of LA combined with ropivacaine in pain control for ankle arthroscopy. Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Methods: We retrospectively collected data for patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy from April 2012 to April 2017. Patients were grouped by anesthesia method: LA, LA with ropivacaine (LA+R), spinal anesthesia (SA), and SA with ropivacaine (SA+R). Intra- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, complications, doses of supplemental pain medication, hospitalization cost and duration, and satisfaction with pain control during hospitalization were analyzed. Results: The study included 276 patients (LA: 93; LA+R: 124; SA: 31; SA+R: 28). The LA and LA+R groups had significantly higher intraoperative VAS scores (LA vs. SA, p = 0.001; LA vs. SA+R, p = 0.002; LA+R vs. SA, p = 0.00; LA+R vs. SA+R, p = 0.00), but fewer complications, than the SA and SA+R groups. The LA+R and SA+R groups had significantly better outcomes for postoperative pain control (LA vs. LA+R, p = 0.01; LA vs. SA+R, p = 0.01; SA vs. SA+R, p = 0.01; SA vs. LA+R, p = 0.03) and required less supplemental pain medication. Hospitalization cost was lower and duration shorter in the LA and LA+R groups than in the SA and SA+R groups. There was no significant difference in satisfaction among the four groups. Limitations: This was a single-center retrospective and relatively short-term study. Conclusions: LA+R which could be safely applied in ankle arthroscopy provided satisfactory pain control, reduced postoperative pain intensity, fewer complications, shorter hospital stay, and good cost-effectiveness. It can be safely applied in ankle arthroscopy for the specific patients with ankle osteoarthritis.

Funder

Beijing Science and Technology Star Program

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3