Informed Consent Documentation for Total Hip and Knee Replacement Using Generic Forms with Blank Spaces

Author:

Mussa Mohamed Altayeb1,Sweed Tamer Ahmed1,Khan Aazer1

Affiliation:

1. Southend Hospital NHS Trust, Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, United Kingdom

Abstract

Purpose. To analyse informed consent documentation of 100 patients undergoing elective primary total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) using generic forms with blank spaces. Methods. Informed consent documentation of 57 men and 43 women (mean age, 54 years) undergoing elective primary THR (n=50) or TKR (n=50) using generic forms with blank spaces were analysed. The consent forms were explained to the patients mostly on the morning of surgery by a consultant surgeon (n=21), specialist registrar (n=23), or senior house officer (n=56). Data on patient demographics, planned procedure, benefits and risks of surgery, and the grade of the surgeon were collected. Results. In the consent forms for THR, the most frequently documented complications included infection (98%), bleeding (96%), deep vein thrombosis (94%), nerve damage (94%), blood vessel damage (94%), and pain (90%). Common complications (2–5% of occurrence) that were less frequently documented included prosthesis wear or loosening (76%), dislocation (68%), and leg length discrepancy (62%). In the consent forms for TKR, the most frequently documented complications included infection (96%), bleeding (92%), deep vein thrombosis (90%), nerve damage (90%), and blood vessel damage (90%). Common risks (2–5% of occurrence) that were less frequently documented included pain (84%), prosthesis wear or loosening (54%), and knee stiffness (40%). Conclusion. Documentation of all clinically significant complications was insufficient when generic informed consent forms with blank spaces were used. The use of standardised procedure-specific consent forms is recommended.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3