A meta-analysis of methylprednisolone in recovery from multiple sclerosis exacerbations

Author:

Miller Deborah M1,Weinstock-Guttman Bianca2,Béthoux François3,Lee Jar-Chi4,Beck Gerald4,Block Vicki5,Durelli Luca6,LaMantia Loredana7,Barnes David8,Sellebjerg Finn9,Rudick Richard A3

Affiliation:

1. I.H. Page Center for Health Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

2. Department of Neurology, SUNY University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo General Hospital, Buffalo, USA

3. Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

4. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

5. I.H. Page Center for Health Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

6. Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Universita di Torino, Torino, Italy

7. Instituto Nazionale Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy

8. Department of Neurology, Atkinson Morley's Hospital, Wimbledon, London, UK

9. Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Despite recent advances in multiple sclerosis treatment, patients experience relapses for which standard treatment remains glucocorticosteroids (GCS). However, there is limited information comparing doses or routes of administration for different GCS types or the benefit of GCS compared to natural recovery. Currently, high dose (HD) methylprednisolone (MP) is the preferred therapy. We conducted meta-analyses of published studies assessing MP at different doses and in comparison to other steroid products or no treatment. Relevant studies were identified through predetermined processes and five articles met the inclusion criteria. Three studies compared HD MP to placebo; two studies compared the effect of HD MP and low dose (LD) MP; only one accepted report compared HD MP to another GCS. This report could not be included in a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of HD MP vs placebo studies indicated a mean treatment difference of 0.76 in Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS) changes from baseline. The meta-analysis of HD and LD MP demonstrated no difference in EDSS change. Despite these rather obvious findings, these meta-analyses have been valuable in identifying further research questions. We recommend studies to determine optimum benefit related to dosage, timing for starting therapy and the most appropriate GCS type. Given the advances in MS therapeutics, these studies will have to include patients on additional disease modifying therapy.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3