Recommendations for the use of propensity score methods in multiple sclerosis research

Author:

Simoneau Gabrielle1ORCID,Pellegrini Fabio2,Debray Thomas PA3ORCID,Rouette Julie4,Muñoz Johanna3,Platt Robert W.5,Petkau John6,Bohn Justin7,Shen Changyu7,de Moor Carl7,Karim Mohammad Ehsanul8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Biogen Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada

2. Biogen Spain, Madrid, Spain

3. University Medical Center Utrecht, Utretch, The Netherlands

4. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada/Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada

5. Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada/Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada/Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada

6. Department of Statistics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

7. Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA

8. School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada/Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Abstract

Background: With many disease-modifying therapies currently approved for the management of multiple sclerosis, there is a growing need to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of those therapies from real-world data sources. Propensity score methods have recently gained popularity in multiple sclerosis research to generate real-world evidence. Recent evidence suggests, however, that the conduct and reporting of propensity score analyses are often suboptimal in multiple sclerosis studies. Objectives: To provide practical guidance to clinicians and researchers on the use of propensity score methods within the context of multiple sclerosis research. Methods: We summarize recommendations on the use of propensity score matching and weighting based on the current methodological literature, and provide examples of good practice. Results: Step-by-step recommendations are presented, starting with covariate selection and propensity score estimation, followed by guidance on the assessment of covariate balance and implementation of propensity score matching and weighting. Finally, we focus on treatment effect estimation and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: This comprehensive set of recommendations highlights key elements that require careful attention when using propensity score methods.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3