The impact of disabilities on quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis

Author:

Wynia K1,Middel B2,van Dijk JP3,De Keyser JHA4,Reijneveld SA3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

2. Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Oral Health and Clinical Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

3. Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

4. Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Objective People with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) experience lower levels of quality of life (QOL) than people from the general population. We examined the relative impact of MS-related disabilities on QOL. Method Data were obtained from a sample of 530 patients who completed the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Profile (MSIP), a disability measure based on the International Classification of Functioning,Disabilities and Health (ICF) and two generic health-related QOL measures, the Medical Outcome study Short Form Questionnaire (SF-36) and the World Health Organization Quality Of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF). The impact of disabilities on QOL was estimated using hierarchical multiple regression analyses after controlling for the clinical course of MS. Results Disabilities contributed to a unique and substantial extent to QOL variance. “Impairments in mental functions” was the most important QOL predictor. “Fatigue” showed the highest prevalence and severity scores, while the impact on QOL was limited. The estimated impact on QOL appeared to be dependent on the applied QOL measure: the WHOQOL-BREF was sensitive to disabilities related to all four ICF components, while the SF-36 was only sensitive to disabilities belonging to the 'body functions' and ‘activities’ components. Conclusion Treatment programmes should target impairments in cognitive functioning, emotional functioning and sleep. Interventions are best evaluated using the WHOQOL-BREF.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 72 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3