Multiple sclerosis registries in Europe – results of a systematic survey

Author:

Flachenecker Peter1,Buckow Karoline2,Pugliatti Maura3,Kes Vanja Bašić4,Battaglia Mario A5,Boyko Alexey6,Confavreux Christian7,Ellenberger David2,Eskic Danica8,Ford David9,Friede Tim2,Fuge Jan10,Glaser Anna11,Hillert Jan11,Holloway Edward12,Ioannidou Eva13,Kappos Ludwig14,Kasilingam Elisabeth15,Koch-Henriksen Nils16,Kuhle Jens14,Lepore Vito17,Middleton Rod12,Myhr Kjell-Morton18,Orologas Anastasios19,Otero Susana20,Pitschnau-Michel Dorothea10,Rienhoff Otto2,Sastre-Garriga Jaume20,Schyns-Liharska Tsveta15,Sutovic Dragana21,Thalheim Christoph15,Trojano Maria22,Vlasov Yan V6,Yaldizli Özgür14,

Affiliation:

1. Neurological Rehabilitation Center Quellenhof, Kuranlagenallee 2, D-75323 Bad Wildbad, Germany

2. University Medical Center, University of Göttingen, Germany

3. University of Sassari, Italy

4. University Hospital Sestre milosrdnice, Croatia

5. Liguria and Tuscany MS Register, Italy

6. All-Russian MS Society, Russia

7. University of Lyon, France

8. Association of MS Societies of Croatia, Croatia

9. Institute of Life Sciences, College of Medicine, Swansea University, UK

10. German MS Society, Germany

11. Karolinska Institute, Sweden

12. UK MS Society, UK

13. Greek MS Society, Greece

14. University Hospital, Switzerland

15. European MS Platform, Brussels, Belgium

16. Danish MS Registry, Copenhagen University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Clinical Institute Aarhus University, Denmark

17. Consortium Mario Negri Sud, Chieti, Italy

18. Norwegian MS Registry and Biobank, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway/KG Jebsen Centre for MS Research, University of Bergen, Norway/University of Bergen, Norway

19. University of Thessaloniki, Greece

20. MS Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

21. MS Society of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

22. Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Italy

Abstract

Background: Identification of MS registries and databases that are currently in use in Europe as well as a detailed knowledge of their content and structure is important in order to facilitate comprehensive analysis and comparison of data. Methods: National MS registries or databases were identified by literature search, from the results of the MS Barometer 2011 and by asking 33 national MS societies. A standardized questionnaire was developed and sent to the registries’ leaders, followed by telephone interviews with them. Results: Twenty registries were identified, with 13 completing the questionnaire and seven being interviewed by telephone. These registries differed widely for objectives, structure, collected data, and for patients and centres included. Despite this heterogeneity, common objectives of the registries were epidemiology ( n=10), long-term therapy outcome ( n=8), healthcare research ( n=9) and support/basis for clinical trials ( n=8). While physician-based outcome measures (EDSS) are used in all registries, data from patients’ perspectives were only collected in six registries. Conclusions: The detailed information on a large number of national MS registries in Europe is a prerequisite to facilitating harmonized integration of existing data from MS registries and databases, as well as comprehensive analyses and comparison across European populations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3