BEST-MS: A prospective head-to-head comparative study of natalizumab and fingolimod in active relapsing MS

Author:

Cohen Mikael1ORCID,Mondot Lydiane2,Bucciarelli Florence3,Pignolet Béatrice3,Laplaud David-Axel4,Wiertlewski Sandrine4,Brochet Bruno5ORCID,Ruet Aurélie5,Defer Gilles6,Derache Nathalie6,Vermersch Patrick7,Zephir Hélène7,Debouverie Marc8,Mathey Guillaume8,Berger Eric9,Cappé Chrystelle10,Labauge Pierre11,Carra Clarisse11ORCID,De Seze Jérôme12,Bigaut Kevin12ORCID,Brassat David3,Lebrun-Frenay Christine1

Affiliation:

1. Service de Neurologie, CRCSEP, Unité de Recherche Clinique Cote d’Azur (UR2CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pasteur 2, Nice, France

2. Service de Radiologie, Unité de Recherche Clinique Cote d’Azur (UR2CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pasteur 2, Nice, France

3. Neurosciences Department, CRCSEP, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France/INSERM U1043—CNRS UMR 5282, Centre de Physiopathologie Toulouse, Toulouse, France

4. CRTI-INSERM U1064, CIC 1413, Service de Neurologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France

5. Service de Neurologie, CRC SEP, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

6. Service de Neurologie, CHU de Caen, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, Caen, France

7. Univ. Lille, INSERM U1172, CHU Lille, FHU Imminent, Lille, France

8. CHRU-Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, CIC, Epidémiologie Clinique, Nancy, France

9. Service de Neurologie, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France

10. Centre d’investigation clinique, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France

11. CHU de Montpellier, MS Unit, Montpellier, France

12. Clinical Investigation Center, Department of Neurology, CHU de Strasbourg, INSERM 1434, Strasbourg, France

Abstract

Background: There are few head-to-head studies to compare highly active treatments in multiple sclerosis (MS) Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness between natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) in active relapsing–remitting MS Method: Best Escalation STrategy in Multiple Sclerosis (BEST-MS) is a multicentric, prospective study with a 12-month follow-up including patients with active MS. Treatment choice was at the discretion of physician. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were collected at baseline and at 12 months. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reaching no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included annualized relapse rate and MRI activity. Results: A total of 223 patients were included (NTZ: 109 and FTY: 114). Treatment groups were well balanced at baseline. Proportion of NEDA patients was 47.8% in NTZ group versus 30.4% in FTY group ( p = 0.015). This superiority was driven by annualized relapse rate and MRI activity. In the multivariate analysis, treatment group was the only factor associated with NEDA at 12 months with a lower probability in FTY group (odds ratio (OR) = 0.49, p = 0.029). Conclusion: BEST-MS is a prospective study that compared head-to-head the effectiveness of NTZ and FTY in active relapsing–remitting MS. Our results suggest a superiority of NTZ over FTY.

Funder

FP7 Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3