Nocebo effects in multiple sclerosis trials: a meta-analysis

Author:

Papadopoulos D.1,Mitsikostas DD2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Athens Naval Hospital, Athens, Greece, Neurology section, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece,

2. Department of Neurology, Athens Naval Hospital, Athens, Greece

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incidence and severity of nocebo responses in trials of symptomatic treatments (STs) and disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: We conducted a systematic Medline search for all randomised, placebo-controlled MS trials published between 1989 and 2009. Meta-analysis of the incidence of nocebo responses was performed by pooling the percentage of placebo-treated patients that exhibited adverse events. Nocebo severity was calculated from the percentage of placebo-treated patients that dropped-out due to drug-related adverse events. Results: Data were extracted from 56 DMT and 44 ST eligible trials. The pooled incidence of nocebo responses was 74.4% (95% CI: 69.92—88.30) in DMT trials and 25.3% (95% CI: 15.24—36.90) in ST trials and was significantly higher in the former ( p < 0.0001). The pooled nocebo severity was 2.1% (95% CI: 1.6—2.67) in DMT and 2.34% (95% CI: 1.54—3.29) in ST trials. Meta-regression analysis revealed a higher nocebo incidence in parallel design ST studies compared to crossover ones ( p = 0.013) and a higher nocebo severity in phase II ST studies compared to phase III ones ( p = 0.0001). Nocebo severity in DMT trials exhibited an association with the year of study publication ( p = 0.011) and the frequency of drug administration ( p = 0.0082). Conclusions: Nocebo responses in MS trials are substantial and appear to have increased significantly in recent years with important implications for both trial design and clinical practice. Furthermore, nocebo responses exhibit an association with medication and trial-related factors.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Neurology

Cited by 58 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3