Using Social Networks to Supplement RDD Telephone Surveys to Oversample Hard-to-Reach Populations: A New RDD+RDS Approach

Author:

Agans Robert P.12ORCID,Zeng Donglin12,Shook-Sa Bonnie E.1,Boynton Marcella H.3,Brewer Noel T.45,Sutfin Erin L.6,Goldstein Adam O.57,Noar Seth M.58,Vallejos Quirina5,Queen Tara L.9,Bowling J. Michael9,Ribisl Kurt M.45

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

2. Carolina Survey Research Laboratory, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

3. Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

4. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

5. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

6. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

7. Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

8. Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

9. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Abstract

Random digit dialing (RDD) telephone sampling, although experiencing declining response rates, remains one of the most accurate and cost-effective data collection methods for generating national population-based estimates. Such methods, however, are inefficient when sampling hard-to-reach populations because the costs of recruiting sufficient sample sizes to produce reliable estimates tend to be cost prohibitive. The authors implemented a novel respondent-driven sampling (RDS) approach to oversample cigarette smokers and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. The new methodology selects RDS referrals or seeds from a probability-based RDD sampling frame and treats the social networks as clusters in the weighting and analysis, thus eliminating the intricate assumptions of RDS. The authors refer to this approach as RDD+RDS. In 2016 and 2017, a telephone survey was conducted on tobacco-related topics with a national sample of 4,208 U.S. adults, as well as 756 referral-based respondents. The RDD+RDS estimates were comparable with stand-alone RDD estimates, suggesting that the addition of RDS responses from social networks improved the precision of the estimates without introducing significant bias. The authors also conducted an experiment to determine whether the number of recruits would vary on the basis of how the RDS recruitment question specified the recruitment population (closeness of relationship, time since last contact, and LGBT vs. tobacco user), and significant differences were found in the number of referrals provided on the basis of question wording. The RDD+RDS sampling approach, as an adaptation of standard RDD methodology, is a practical tool for survey methodologists that provides an efficient strategy for oversampling rare or elusive populations.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

center for tobacco products

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference49 articles.

1. AAPOR (American Association for Public Opinion Research). 2016. “Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys.”9th ed. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR.

2. ACS (American Community Survey). 2011–2015. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.

3. Pilot Study of Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking Among US Muslim College Students

4. Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Their Association With Smoking Outcome Expectancies Among Homeless Smokers in Boston

5. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. 2012. “National Survey Data.” Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3