Why isn’t the addressing of intersectional discrimination and disadvantage a key leadership priority in English schools?

Author:

Trevenna Jo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The University of Buckingham, Buckingham, UK

Abstract

This paper explores current accountability mechanisms for the leadership of equality, equity, diversity and inclusion in addressing intersectional discrimination faced by pupils in English schools. I draw on the work of Kimberlé Crenshaw and Patricia Hill Collins in the critical framing of intersectional discrimination and the work of UK-based academics, notably David Gillborn, in examining the impact of intersectional discrimination on pupils in the English education system. I argue that an intersectional approach can deepen understanding and acknowledge the complexities of human identity and therefore offer more sophisticated support systems for pupils. The dangers of diluting the recognition of the impact of singular, shared identity attributes are considered in the context of power hierarchies at the points of intersection and balanced against the recognition that a focus on single characteristics and a totalising view of identity may reduce understanding which can then limit equity action for equality.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3