Improving the equity landscape at U.S. academic institutions: 10 strategies to lead change

Author:

Fernandez Claudia SP1,Taylor Monica M2,Dave Gaurav234,Brandert Kathleen5,Larkin Suzanna1ORCID,Mollenkopf Katherine1,Corbie Giselle236

Affiliation:

1. Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States

2. Center for Health Equity Research, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States

3. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States

4. Abacus Evaluation, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States

5. College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States

6. Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States

Abstract

In the United States, disparities with respect to race, ethnicity, and gender are common across academic institutions, particularly those that are large and have health research-oriented missions. Disparity-affected issues include leadership roles, funding, tenure, and salary. This paper presents a review of the current literature describing those disparities, with a focus on health professions serving major universities in the United States, and proposes approaches to create greater diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (DEIB) within them. While many organizations nationally are working to address DEIB disparities, academic institutions can benefit from implementing structured approaches and training to nurture their cultures, foster DEIB, and promote psychological safety. We present a literature-based 10-component approach institutions can adopt with relative ease and thus positively support advancing their DEIB engagement. These 10 strategies include the following: Clearly stating DEI values; Conducting gap analyses to identify issues; Using incentives to propel change; Removing bias from recruiting processes; Implementing blind applications processes; Diversifying selection committees; Creating inter-institutional partnerships that truly represent shared power; Developing people and the pipeline; Formalizing mentorship and sponsorship programs; and instituting anti-bias training. Easily implementable strategies can both foster change and build the will and confidence to pursue larger DEIB goals in the future.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference68 articles.

1. Association of American Medical Colleges (2019) 2018–2019 the state of women in academic medicine: exploring pathways to equity. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/data/2018-2019-state-women-academic-medicine-exploring-pathways-equity (accessed 28 April 2022).

2. For us by us: Instituting mentorship models that credit minoritized medical faculty expertise and lived experience

3. Strategies to improve equity in faculty hiring

4. Combating Structural Inequities — Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Clinical and Translational Research

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3