Affiliation:
1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Mississippi State University PO Box 9542 Mississippi State, MS 39762
Abstract
Subjective discomfort ratings are a common assessment technique in human factors and ergonomics, and there exist a number of different methods for analyzing ratings (e.g., mean, median, maximum rating, etc.). The objective of this research was to evaluate multiple methods for analyzing body discomfort ratings. Perceived discomfort of eight participants was measured across ten body parts (buttock, left buttock, right buttock, lower back, upper back, neck, shoulder, eye, thigh and whole body) during 2-hour simulated driving tasks at 3 backrest angles (105°, 120°, 135°). Discomfort ratings were collected every 15 minutes using a modified Borg CR-scale. The time weighted discomfort (TWD) average of was found to be more sensitive to backrest angle changes than other measures considered. In addition, factor analysis revealed different methods provided different groupings of body parts, and the method selected for analyzing subjective discomfort ratings should be selected based on the objective of the study.
Subject
General Medicine,General Chemistry
Reference17 articles.
1. Seating comfort and its relationship to spinal profile: A pilot study
2. A comparison of AME and CR100 for scaling perceived exertion
3. England M. A., Wakely J. (2006). Color atlas of the brain and spinal cord: An introduction to normal neuroanatomy. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier. pp. 223.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献