Influence of Taillight Brightness on the Ability to Recognize Closing Speed, Closing Distance, and Closing vs. Separating

Author:

Dinakar Swaroop1,Muttart Jeffrey W.1,Garrison Teena1,Gernhard Suntasy1,Marr Jim2

Affiliation:

1. Crash Safety Research Center, LLC

2. Kineticorp, LLC

Abstract

Rear-end crashes contribute to a large percentage of fatal collisions in the United States. However, every rear-end collision cannot be classified as a single type of crash. Some crashes may be caused due to human error while some crashes may be attributed to a human inability to recognize closing speed well. Observers were shown two 4-second video clips of a commercial vehicle closing on a slow-moving vehicle on an unlit highway. The lead vehicle was depicted at distances of 91m (300 ft), 128m (420 ft) and 152m (500 ft). Closing speeds of 40 km/h (25 mph) and 105 km/h (65 mph) were depicted. The taillights on the lead vehicle were randomly shown as bright, or 80% dimmer which is typical of older taillights or aged retroreflective materials. Results showed that observers’ ability to recognize closing from separating worsened with increased distance, dimmer taillights and lower closing speeds. Observers perceived brighter taillights to be closer. Also, at greater distances, observers did not recognize closing speeds as well.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,General Chemistry

Reference28 articles.

1. Detection of Vehicle Velocity Changes during Expressway Driving

2. Motion Extrapolation of Car-Following Scenes in Younger and Older Drivers

3. Dingus T. A., Klauer S. G., Neale V. L., Petersen A., Lee S. E., Sudweeks J., Perez M. A., Hankey J., Ramsey D., Gupta S., Bucher C., Doerzaph Z. R., Jermeland J., Knipling R. R. (2006). The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, Phase II - Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment DOT HS 810 593. NHTSA, USDOT.

4. Brightness as an Indicator to Distance: Relative Brightness per Se or Contrast with the Background?

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3