Transport Pilot Workload: A Comparison of Two Subjective Techniques

Author:

Battiste Vernoi1,Bortolussi Michael2

Affiliation:

1. NASA-Ames Research Center

2. Western Aerospace Laboratories Moffett Field, California

Abstract

Although SWAT and NASA-TLX workload scales have been compared on numerous occasions, they have not been compared in the context of transport operations. Transport pilot workload has traditionally been classified as long periods of low workload with occasional spikes of high workload. Thus, the relative sensitivity of the scales to variations in workload at the low end of the scale were evaluated. This study was a part of a larger study which investigated workload measures for aircraft certification, conducted in a Phase II certified Link/Boeing 727 simulator. No significant main effects were found for any performance- based measures of workload. However both SWAT and NASA-TLX were sensitive to differences between high and low workload flights and to differences among flight segments. NASA-TLX (but not SWAT) was sensitive to the increase in workload during the cruise segment of the high workload flight Between-subject variability was high for SWAT. NASA-TLX was found to be stable when compared in the test/retest paradigm. A test/retest by segment interaction suggested that this was not the case for SWAT ratings.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference8 articles.

1. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research

2. Nataupsky M., Abbott T. (1987). Comparison of workload measures on a computer-generated primary flight display. Proceedings of Human Factors Society 31th Annual Meeting (pp.548–552) Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

3. Reid G. B., Shingledecker C. A., Eggemeier F. T. (1981). Application of conjoint measurement to workload scale development. In the Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 522–526). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factor Society.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3