A Computer Keyboard Key Feel Study in Performance and Preference

Author:

Akagi Kenichi1

Affiliation:

1. Wang Laboratories Inc. Lowell, MA

Abstract

A study was conducted to compare user preference and performance of four keyboards having different key force and travel characteristics. Two keyboards had linear spring key action, one with low (key force) resistance (42.5 grams) and one with high resistance (70.9 grams). The other two keyboards had tactile (snap) action, one with low resistance (35.5 grams) and one with high resistance (70.9 grams). All four keyboards were manufactured by the same company, and were visually identical in size, layout, color, etc. There was no difference in typing sound and traveling distance among the four keyboards. Twenty four touch typists typed material taken from a college psychology textbook for seven to eight minutes on each keyboard. Between changing keyboards, the participants rested one minute. The two low resistance (35.5 grams tactile, 42.5 grams linear spring action) keyboards produced 23.3% more errors (57% of total errors) than the two high resistance keyboards (43% of total errors). There was a 10.28% difference in errors between the low resistance spring and the low tactile action keyboards, and there was only a 2.95% difference in error between the high resistance spring and the high resistance tactile action keyboards. The lighter the key resistance, the more errors were produced. The average typing speed of all of the participants indicated that there was no significant typing speed difference among the four keyboards. The keyboards preferred by the participants were almost evenly distributed among the low resistance linear (42.5 grams, 29% of participants), the low resistance tactile (35.5 grams, 29% of participants) and the high resistance tactile (70.9 grams, 25% of participants) keyboards. The high resistance linear (70.9 grams, 17% of participants) keyboard was chosen least.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference2 articles.

1. Cakir A., Hart D.J., Stewart T.F.M., Visual Display Terminals, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1980, p. 128–129

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A comparative study of text entry performance of low-profile versus high-profile keyboards;Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments;2020-06-26

2. Button Simulation and Design via FDVV Models;Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2020-04-21

3. One Button to Rule Them All;The 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology Adjunct Proceedings;2018-10-11

4. Neuromechanics of a Button Press;Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2018-04-21

5. A New Force-Displacement Metrology for Keyboards;Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting;1997-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3