Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology, and Center for Visualization and Virtual Environments University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky
Abstract
Today decision makers may benefit from richer sources of data and a wider variety of visualization tools than ever. However, the extent to which individuals make adequate use of a “toolkit” of visualization modes – choosing the right formats to support different task demands – has received relatively little attention. In the present study, a sample of 43 participants learned to perform three decision-making tasks with a five geospatial formats or “views.” When allowed to choose their own views prior to beginning different tasks, few participants spontaneously selected those displays that would provide the greatest performance support. Most participants fell prey to “naïve realism” (a preference for realistic-looking displays) or “viewpoint inertia” (a preference for familiar map-like displays). These data suggest that greater attention needs to be given to the training of basic visualization skills as well as possibly limiting display choices in some contexts.
Subject
General Medicine,General Chemistry
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献