Affiliation:
1. VA Midwest Patient Safety Center of Inquiry Cincinnati, OH
2. University of Chicago Chicago, IL
3. VA Medical Center Cincinnati, OH
Abstract
In this paper, we explore the barriers wrong-site surgery guidelines face when applied in current work practice. Over 40 hours of direct observation of the entire care process (from initial consultation through post-operative care) were conducted. A breakdown in communication between surgical team members and the patient, operating room policy and procedures, incomplete patient assessment, staffing issues, distraction, and availability of pertinent information were identified by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) in 1998. In response to the high visibility of wrong-sited surgeries, the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) among others, developed guidelines intended to reduce the risk but failed to account for the dynamic complex environment. Several process elements emerged from our analysis of observation and interview data as they affected the outpatient surgical process of identification. This paper suggests strategies to enhance resiliency already present in the system.
Subject
General Medicine,General Chemistry
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Reducing and Mitigating Human Error in Medicine;Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics;2005-06
2. Righting Wrong Site Surgery;The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety;2004-07