Usability Evaluation of Two Social Networking Sites

Author:

Rivera Javier1,Davis Fleet1,Mouloua Mustapha1,Alberti Pascal2

Affiliation:

1. University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida

2. Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Compiègne France

Abstract

This paper examines differences between the two most popular social networking sites (Facebook and MySpace) in terms of their usability and design heuristics. First, we discuss a brief history on social network websites that have dominated the Internet in popularity and then declined over time due to major setbacks or system design failures. Second, we discuss usability heuristics and how they can be incorporated to social network websites to improve their chances of success among users. Lastly, we present a study in which we have used an adapted usability questionnaire based on these usability heuristics. This usability questionnaire compares Facebook and MySpace by rating them across eight dimensions such as simplicity, usefulness, functionality, consistency, proficiency, satisfaction, behavior, and needs for improvement. There was a significant difference between both social networks, indicating that Facebook was rated the highest on usability over MySpace.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,General Chemistry

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Convergent Usability Evaluation of the HFES Website;Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting;2022-09

2. European Portuguese Validation of Usefulness, Satisfaction and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE);Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing;2017

3. The effects of mental model conformity on usability in apps;Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting;2013-09

4. An empirical usability evaluation of the Human Factors website;Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting;2012-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3