Effect of Level of Automation on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Routing Task

Author:

Calhoun Gloria L.1,Draper Mark H.1,Ruff Heath A.2

Affiliation:

1. 711 Human Performance Wing Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio

2. Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corporation Fairborn, Ohio

Abstract

Supervisory control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) raises many issues concerning the balance of system autonomy with human interaction for optimal operator situation awareness and system performance. A UAV simulation environment designed to manipulate the application of automation was used to evaluate participants' performance on routing tasks under three levels of automation. Trials also involved completion of several mission-related secondary tasks as participants supervised either one or three UAVs. Both objective and subjective data were collected. The results showed that participants took longer to complete the routing task when automation was high due to the time they spent verifying the accuracy of the imperfect decision aid. These results show the importance of designing an interface that provides an efficient means of interacting with the automation and communicates the automation's rationale, especially under high automation levels.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,General Chemistry

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Understanding Automation Failure;Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making;2024-01-04

2. To (Dis)agree with Automation: Effects of Automation Levels on Trust Attitude and Trust Behavior in High-Risk Situations;Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting;2023-09

3. Deep learning, transparency, and trust in human robot teamwork;Trust in Human-Robot Interaction;2021

4. The Harder They Fall? A Response to Wickens et al. (2019) Regarding the Generalizability of Lumberjack Predictions to Complex Work Settings;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;2020-02-07

5. Absence of DOA Effect but No Proper Test of the Lumberjack Effect: A Reply to Jamieson and Skraaning (2019);Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;2020-01-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3