Validity of the Multiple Resources Questionnaire (MRQ)

Author:

Boles David B.1,Adair Lindsey P.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Abstract

The Multiple Resources Questionnaire (MRQ) is an easily administered 17-item measure for subjective workload assessment that aims to provide high diagnosticity by identifying the load on specific resources. Here validity data from two experiments are reported. Experiment 1 employs two computer-based games and finds that workload as assessed by the MRQ correlates significantly with ratings of overall workload, and with a composite of time demand, mental demand, and stress demand ratings. Because these are important dimensions of other well-accepted workload instruments (i.e., OW, NASA-TLX, and SWAT), the results support the construct validity of the MRQ. Experiment 2 assesses interference between pairings of four laboratory-based tasks, and finds that MRQ-based similarity indices significantly predict the degree of interference between tasks. This outcome supports the criterion validity of the MRQ.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,General Chemistry

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Development of a Quantitative Evaluation Tool of Cognitive Workload in Field Studies Through Eye Tracking;Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics;2019

2. Measurement of Mental Workload Changes during Laparoscopy with a Visual-Spatial Task;Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting;2015-09

3. Interview to Questionnaire Comparison of Workload Measurement on Nuclear Power Plant Tasks;Procedia Manufacturing;2015

4. Viewing the Workload of Vigilance Through the Lenses of the NASA-TLX and the MRQ;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;2013-04-22

5. Bidirectional Resource Training of Simple and Complex Tasks;Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting;2012-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3