Affiliation:
1. HFE Consulting, Campbell, CA
Abstract
Cultural differences may affect a person's response to a warning, however, little research exists to help understand those differences. Developing warnings to address needs of additional groups, such as cultural minorities, would benefit from more time- and cost-effective processes than have been traditionally employed. This study describes the application of a rapid, collaborative and iterative prototype design and evaluation process to the development of a warning pictorial with a multicultural audience. Results of the study showed that the iteratively revised pictorial was sufficient for over 90% of the English- and Spanish-speaking participants to perceive the presence of a hazard, and to indicate that they would avoid the hazard. Implications for future research are discussed.
Subject
General Medicine,General Chemistry
Reference16 articles.
1. ANSI Z535.3. (2006). American National Standard Criteria for Safety Symbols, Annex B (Informative) General Procedures for Evaluating Candidate Symbols. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn VA.
2. Oral and Written Symbol Comprehension Testing: The Benefit of Cognitive Interview Probing
3. Symbols for industrial safety