Abstract
After 1989, the Czech and Slovak health-care systems followed dissimilar policies. Change was faster, more profound and more experimental in the Czech Republic. But after 10 years there are clear similarities in their health status achievements and systemic problems. By showing how a common past and a similar insurance-based finance model interact with commitments to universal access, the common outcomes and problems are explained. It is argued that greater spending, rather than privatization, has improved health-care outcomes since transition began. It is also argued that most of the key problems with the two systems are finance related.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference3 articles.
1. Social security reform for economic transition: the case of the Czech Republic
2. Hungary: Social Policy in Transition
3. Orenstein, M. (1995). “Transitional Social Policy in the Czech Republic and Poland.” Sociological Review, 3: 179-196 .
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献