Affiliation:
1. University of Maryland, Baltimore County,
2. Department of International Affairs at the University of Georgia
Abstract
‘Cognitive locks’ are ideational path dependencies in policy making (Blyth, 2001). This article argues that one source of cognitive locks is the presence of single party dominant regimes. Single party dominant regimes exist where a single party has managed to control the process of executive formation for an unusually long period of time. Because of their long tenure in executive office, dominant parties are often in positions to implement strong cognitive locks on their political societies. Not all cognitive locks are the same, however. Rather, how the dominant party behaved, either as a ‘distributional coalition’ or as an ‘encompassing organization’ (Olson, 1982) and how it subsequently incorporated ‘voice’ (Hirschman, 1970) to accommodate multiple interests, strongly influence the scope of the dominant party’s cognitive lock. These observations are utilized in two brief case illustrations derived from well-known cases of single party dominance.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference53 articles.
1. Back to the Future
2. Electoral change and its impact on the party system in Italy
3. Barnes SH ( 1966) Italy: oppositions on left, right, and center. In: Dahl R (ed.) Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 303-331.
4. Bedani G. ( 2002) Italy in historical perspective: the legacies of fascism and anti-fascism. In: Berger S and Compston H (eds) Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe. New York: Berghahn Books, 191-206.
5. The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas, Distributional Conflict, and Institutional Change
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献