The formation of cognitive locks in single party dominant regimes

Author:

Forestiere Carolyn1,Allen Christopher S.2

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland, Baltimore County,

2. Department of International Affairs at the University of Georgia

Abstract

‘Cognitive locks’ are ideational path dependencies in policy making (Blyth, 2001). This article argues that one source of cognitive locks is the presence of single party dominant regimes. Single party dominant regimes exist where a single party has managed to control the process of executive formation for an unusually long period of time. Because of their long tenure in executive office, dominant parties are often in positions to implement strong cognitive locks on their political societies. Not all cognitive locks are the same, however. Rather, how the dominant party behaved, either as a ‘distributional coalition’ or as an ‘encompassing organization’ (Olson, 1982) and how it subsequently incorporated ‘voice’ (Hirschman, 1970) to accommodate multiple interests, strongly influence the scope of the dominant party’s cognitive lock. These observations are utilized in two brief case illustrations derived from well-known cases of single party dominance.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference53 articles.

1. Back to the Future

2. Electoral change and its impact on the party system in Italy

3. Barnes SH ( 1966) Italy: oppositions on left, right, and center. In: Dahl R (ed.) Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 303-331.

4. Bedani G. ( 2002) Italy in historical perspective: the legacies of fascism and anti-fascism. In: Berger S and Compston H (eds) Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe. New York: Berghahn Books, 191-206.

5. The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas, Distributional Conflict, and Institutional Change

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3