Affiliation:
1. University of Michigan, USA
Abstract
This article discusses three main challenges to gaining a better understanding of whether state capacity contributes to the resilience of electoral authoritarian regimes. First, the concept of state capacity is multi-dimensional and can be entangled with regime organizational structures. Second, there is a range of different mechanisms through which elections may draw upon capacity in these different dimensions to affect authoritarian resilience. Third, good indicators of the dimensions of state capacity for empirical work are sorely lacking. To address these challenges, this article outlines the connections between extractive, coercive and administrative dimensions of state capacity with regard to how electoral authoritarian regimes address threats arising from society and from within the ruling elite. It then assesses different approaches to measuring these dimensions for empirical work.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. It’s the state, indeed! How state capacity facilitates social equality in authoritarian regimes;Contemporary Politics;2024-03-06
2. Subnational State Capacity and Pro-Government Voting in Russia;The Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia;2023-06-14
3. Between Scylla and Charybdis: Land Reform and Local Agents Under the Chinese Communist Regime;Studies in Comparative International Development;2023-04-01
4. Influence of elite rotation on authoritarian resilience;Democratization;2023-03-21
5. Introduction;Democracy, State Capacity and the Governance of COVID-19 in Asia-Oceania;2023-01-31