Affiliation:
1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
2. Kyoto University, Japan
Abstract
Almost all popular and academic assessments of Thaksin Shinawatra label him a populist, with his time in power characterized by populism. Through an assessment of conceptual accounts of populism and a discussion of Thaksin’s political campaigning and his prime ministership, it is argued that this characterization is inaccurate. While electorally popular, Thaksin’s populism was slow to develop. Thaksin’s emergence as a populist reflected a configuration of political circumstances that forced him to rely increasingly on the support of an electoral base made up of the relatively less well-off. In failing to account for the development of Thaksin as a populist, an important element of Thaksin’s politics and of populism as a form of politics is missed. Thaksin was made a populist by elite opposition, military coup and the political demands by the red shirt mass movement wanting social and economic equality underpinned by electoral representation.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference38 articles.
1. After Neoliberalization?
2. Brown Andrew, Thonachaisetavut Bundit, Hewison Kevin (2002) Labour Relations and Regulation in Thailand: Theory and practice. Working Paper Series No. 27. Hong Kong: Southeast Asia Research Centre.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献