Radiographic Findings and Etiologic Diagnosis in Ambulatory Childhood Pneumonias

Author:

McCarthy Paul L.1,Spiesel Sydney Z.1,Stashwick Carole A.1,Ablow Ronald C.1,Masters Stuart J.1,Dolan Thomas F.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine and The Yale-New Haven Hospital, Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine and The Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut

Abstract

The chest roqntgenograms of 128 consecutive ambulatory children with radiologic pneumonia were read independently and without clinical informa tion by a faculty general pediatrician (Ped), a pediatric radiologist (R-P) and a general radiologist (R-G). The films were classified as normal, indicative of a viral or bacterial process, or indeterminate. Readings were compared with re sults of viral titers and bacterial cultures. Agreement between any two observers in classifying films, measured by unweighted Kappa, while statistically significant (p < 0.001) for any pair, was low.There was no significant difference between the agreement scores of Ped/R- P, Ped/R-G, and R-P/R-G. Twenty-one patients had fourfold viral titer increases (N = 16) or positive bacterial cultures of blood or pulmonary aspirate (N = 5).'The sensitivity of viral readings for titer increases varied from 19% to 68% depending on observer type; the sensitivity of bacterial readings for positive bacterial cultures varied from 60% to 80%. The three observers agreed on a correct reading in only three children with viral and three with bacterial pneumonia. Because of poor observer agreement and appreciable false-negative errors when viral and bacterial readings were compared to titer increases and positive bacterial cultures, respectively, we conclude that radiographic findings are poor indicators of etiologic diagnosis in ambulatory childhood pneumonias and, of themselves, are an insufficient data base for making therapeutic decisions.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cited by 70 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3