Study of the Usefulness of Clinical and Hematologic Findings in the Diagnosis of Neonatal Bacterial Infections

Author:

Spector Stephen A.,Ticknor Warren,Grossman Moses

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of clinical and hematologic findings in distinguishing infected from uninfected newborn infants. Of 356 evaluations for infections, 22 (6%) infants were found to have bacterial isolates. Eight of the 52 clinical and historical findings evaluated were found to be statistically associated with infection. Clinical findings of tachypnea/arrhythmia, decreased peripheral perfusion, pallor, hypo- or hyper tension, abdominal distention, irritability, lethargy, and apnea were signifi cantly associated with positive bacterial cultures. Laboratory data found to be significantly associated with infected infants included white blood cell count < 10,000 or ≥20,000/mm 3, absolute neutrophil count < 1,000/mm3, absolute band count > 200/mm3, and neutrophil band forms/mature neutrophils ≥ 0.10. A 5-point scoring system was derived from the data obtained from this study consisting of: ≥ 2 systems involved on clinical assessment; white blood cells < 10,000 or ≥20,000/mm 3; absolute neutrophils < 1,000/mm3; bands/mature neutrophils ≥ 0.10; and age > 1 week. The restrospective use of this scoring system revealed that all infants with life-threatening bacterial infections had three or more of these findings present. All infants suspected of bacterial disease, therefore, who score ≥ 3 points using this system should have antibiotic therapy started and continued until all cultures are negative. In the face of other strong clinical or laboratory evidence of infection, antibiotics should be begun following appropriate cultures, in spite of a low score. So used, the scoring sys tem described can be helpful to clinicians in making decisions concerning newborn infants suspected of bacterial infections.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3