Familiarity of Pediatricians With Different Commercially Available Neonatal and Infant Formulas

Author:

Teitelbaum Jonathan E.1,Lagmay Joanne P.2

Affiliation:

1. Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Children's Hospital at Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, New Jersey, , Drexel University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

2. The Children's Hospital at Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, New Jersey

Abstract

To assess the familiarity of pediatricians with commercially available formulas and their use for cow's milk protein allergy and colic, a list of formulas was generated by visiting several grocery stores. Pediatricians were ask to indicate their familiarity with these and other “specialized” formulas with regard to protein and carbohydrate sources, energy content, hypoallergenicity, and indication for infant colic. The participants answered an average of 46% of the questions correctly. Respondents were very familiar with 27% of the formulas, and unfamiliar with 35%. The highest score was 70%, and 10% of the responders correctly answered 65% or more of the questions. Fifty-one percent correctly identified the protein source of the formulas; 32% correctly identified the carbohydrate source. The energy content of the formulas was correctly identified by 54%. These data suggest that pediatricians have a poor understanding of the content and appropriate use of neonatal and infant formulas.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference13 articles.

1. Hypoallergenic Infant Formulas

2. Soy Protein-based Formulas: Recommendations for Use in Infant Feeding

3. Iron Fortification of Infant Formulas

4. Conkin CA, Gilger MA, Jennings HC, et al. The Baylor Pediatric Nutrition Handbook. 2nd ed. Houston, Tex: Baylor College of Medicine; 2001:69-102.

5. Hardiman G. In: Walker WA, Duggan C, Watkins JB, eds. Nutrition in Pediatrics: Enteral Nutrition, Appendix. 3rd ed. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: BC Decker Inc; 2003: 1060-1074.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3