Affiliation:
1. From the Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
Abstract
Historically, inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have been inserted in the Radiology Department or the Operating Room. When initially designed, vena cava filters required surgical cut down of the internal jugular vein to insert a large (24 French) introducer and it was therefore necessary to perform this procedure in the operating room. Percutaneous methods (e.g., the Seldinger technique) with smaller profile sheath-dilator devices (6 to 12 French) have made IVC filter insertion a much easier procedure. Furthermore, the remaining equipment is simple, portable, and readily available throughout most hospitals (e.g., C-arm, contrast, sterile drapes, gowns, gloves, catheters, etc.). These factors have made it easy to “bring the procedure to the patient.” This is particularly advantageous in critically ill ICU patients. Complication rates of “road trips” for critically ill patients from the ICU to other parts of the hospital (i.e., radiology department or operating room) can result in a mishap rate of 5–30. Secondary benefits of bedside insertion of vena cava filters include cost-effectiveness.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Bedside Placement of Inferior Vena Cava Filter;Atlas of Trauma/Emergency Surgical Techniques;2014