The Demographics and Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society Membership Status of Surgery’s Top Leadership

Abstract

Purpose Diversity and equity are priorities of many academic Departments of Surgery (DoS). Induction into Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society (AOA) denotes academic excellence and can potentially propel an academic career. Research has demonstrated that underrepresented in medicine (URM) students are less likely to be elected to AOA. In this study, we aim to examine the Chairs in American departments of surgery to examine their gender, racial, and ethnic background and AOA membership status. Method An anonymous survey was generated via REDCap and electronically sent to the Chair of Surgery at the top 75 DoS based on “Reputation” on Doximity Residency Navigator 2020-2021. Seven chairs with non-publicly accessible email addresses were excluded. Results Of the eligible chairs (N = 68), 38 (55.9%) completed the survey, of which 34 (89.5%) identified as men. AOA membership was reported in 65.8% (n = 25) respondents, with 8% (n = 2) self-identifying as women and 92% (n = 23) self-identifying as men. Of the men respondents, 74% (n = 25) reported AOA membership, while 50% of women (n = 2) reported AOA membership. Of the AOA chairs, 4% (n = 1) self-identified as Asian while 96% (n = 24) self-identified as White. The majority (57.9%, n = 22) of eligible chair respondents were White, men, and AOA members. Of the 25 AOA members, 18 (72.0%) felt their membership has positively impacted their career. Conclusions We found that the majority of American Surgical Chairs self-identify as white men. The number of men who were AOA was higher than women chairs.