What Operations Should a Modern Rural Surgeon Do?

Abstract

Rural patients have fewer complications and deaths, shorter hospital stay, and less resource utilization than their urban counterparts. They also tend to have fewer chronic illnesses; this reflects a system working as intended, with high-risk patients transferred to better-resourced institutions, while others receive surgical care closer to home. Deciding which operations a modern rural surgeon should—and shouldn’t—perform starts with the question “Who decides?” Government, insurers, hospitals, surgeons, and patients are all stakeholders, with a vested interest in the answer. Rural hospitals depend on surgeons for their financial existence, and rural surgeons need hospitals to function. The closure of rural hospitals throughout the country threatens the future of rural surgery. Without surgeons, rural patients will die unnecessarily. During the first COVID surge, patients died from such basic surgical emergencies as small bowel obstruction, when tertiary referral hospitals were full. Rural surgeons are essential in providing timely care of the injured patient; even today, patients die in isolated facilities from treatable injuries from lack of a surgeon who can do a splenectomy, or tube thoracostomy for traumatic pneumothorax, for example. Recruitment of rural surgeons requires identifying interested trainees, often from rural backgrounds, and a defined residency curriculum with emphasis on endoscopy and vascular surgery plus basic gynecology, obstetrics, urology, and orthopedics. Financial incentives & credentials support are also essential for the new rural surgeon. We need to develop many more focused rural surgery programs, and quickly, before the possibility of a broadly skilled rural surgeon in the USA evaporates.