Are Data Driving Our Ambulances? Liberal Use of Tranexamic Acid in the Prehospital Setting

Author:

Brito Alexandra M.P.1,Stettler Gregory2,Fram Madeline R.2,Winslow James2,Martin R. Shayne2

Affiliation:

1. Atrium Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, The Queen’s Medical Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Honolulu, HI, USA

2. Atrium Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

Abstract

Background Current data on tranexamic acid (TXA) supports early administration for severe hemorrhagic shock. Administration by EMS has been facilitated by developing protocols and standing orders informed by these data. In this study, patterns of TXA use by EMS agencies serving a large level 1 trauma center were examined. We hypothesized that current widespread TXA use often includes administration outside of data-driven indications. Methods The trauma registry at a level 1 trauma center was queried for patients who received TXA. To determine the practice patterns and appropriateness of administration of TXA, patients’ physiologic state in the prehospital environment based on EMS records, physiologic state on arrival to hospital, and interventions performed in both settings were examined. Over 20 separately managed EMS systems that administer TXA transport patients to this trauma center, allowing for a broad survey of practices. Results From 2016 to 2021 1089 patients received TXA, 406 (37.3%) having treatment initiated by EMS services. Of these, the average prehospital systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 108.2 mmHg and initial ED SBP was 107.8 mmHg. Only 58.4% of these patients received blood transfusion after arrival to this trauma center. Compliance with standard indications was low with only 14.6% of administrations meeting any data-driven SBP indication. Similar levels of compliance were seen across high volume EMS services. Discussion Tranexamic acid use has become common in trauma and has been adopted by many EMS systems. These results indicate TXA in the prehospital setting is over-used as administration is not being limited to indications that have shown benefit in prior data.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3