The Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Approach to Resection of Pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms: An Underused Technique?

Author:

Postlewait Lauren M.1,Ethun Cecilia G.1,Mcinnis Mia R.1,Merchant Nipun2,Parikh Alexander3,Idrees Kamran3,Isom Chelsea A.3,Hawkins William4,Fields Ryan C.4,Strand Matthew4,Weber Sharon M.5,Cho Clifford S.5,Salem Ahmed5,Martin Robert C.G.6,Scoggins Charles6,Bentrem David7,Kim Hong J.8,Carr Jacquelyn8,Ahmad Syed9,Abbott Daniel5,Wilson Gregory C.9,Kooby David A.1,Maithel Shishir K.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

2. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

3. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

4. Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

5. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin

6. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky

7. Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

8. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

9. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio

Abstract

Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) are rare tumors typically of the distal pancreas that harbor malignant potential. Although resection is recommended, data are limited on optimal operative approaches to distal pancreatectomy for MCN. MCN resections (2000–2014; eight institutions) were included. Outcomes of minimally invasive and open MCN resections were compared. A total of 289 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy for MCN: 136(47%) minimally invasive and 153(53%) open. Minimally invasive procedures were associated with smaller MCN size (3.9 vs 6.8 cm; P = 0.001), lower operative blood loss (192 vs 392 mL; P = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay(5 vs 7 days; P = 0.001) compared with open. Despite higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, hand-assisted (n = 46) had similar advantages as laparoscopic/robotic (n = 76). When comparing hand-assisted to open, although MCN size was slightly smaller (4.1 vs 6.8 cm; P = 0.001), specimen length, operative time, and nodal yield were identical. Similar to laparoscopic/robotic, hand-assisted had lower operative blood loss (161 vs 392 mL; P = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (5 vs 7 days; P = 0.03) compared with open, without increased complications. Hand-assisted laparoscopic technique is a useful approach for MCN resection because specimen length, lymph node yield, operative time, and complication profiles are similar to open procedures, but it still offers the advantages of a minimally invasive approach. Hand-assisted laparoscopy should be considered as an alternative to open technique or as a successive step before converting from total laparoscopic to open distal pancreatectomy for MCN.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3