Comparison of Blood Transfusion Free Pancreaticoduodenectomy to Transfusion-Eligible Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Author:

Choi Yoon Young1,Seo Daekwan2,Choi Dongho1,Kim Jung Hoon3,Lee Kyung-Jae4,Ok Si Young5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

2. Laboratory of Experimental Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

3. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

4. Departments of Occupational Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

5. Departments of Anesthesiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Even though the surgical techniques and perioperative care have improved, blood transfusions are still often required for the patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). But complications from blood transfusions, poor prognosis of blood transfused patients, cost, and availability of blood products demand transfusion free (TF) surgery in the PD patients. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcome of TF pancreaticoduodenectomy with transfusion-eligible (TE) PD. We had investigated the possibility of blood TF treatments for the patients who underwent PD from December 2005 to August 2007. There were 41 cases of PD performed by one surgeon with the same method: 14 patients of the TF group and 27 patients of the TE group. Most of the TF group patients received perioperative blood augmentation and intraoperative acute normovolemic hemodilution. The results of statistical analysis between TF and TE group showed that there were no statistical differences in intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes, except preoperative hemoglobin levels, type of operations, and transfusion amount. To our best knowledge, this is the first successful PD program in selected patients as a series of operations without blood transfusion. TF PD can be done successfully in selected patients without severe complications.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3